The filing says the goal is to reduce collisions. The fix narrows one driveway to right-turn-only and pushes internal traffic toward the signalized exit. County staff found the work appears to encroach on two easements, including a water easement.
The Amazon distribution center on Kirkville Road in DeWitt has two full-access driveways onto a county highway. Amazon wants to close half of one of them.
This story came from public records we pulled ourselves
Get the next one, plus overnight incidents, in your inbox at 6 AM. Free, no spam.
The Onondaga County Planning Board reviewed the site plan on August 5 as case Z-26-182. The applicant is listed as Avodeji Akanji for Amazon. The referring board is the Town of DeWitt Planning Board. The site is a 42 acre parcel at 6834 Kirkville Road in a High-Tech zoning district.
Nothing is being built. This is a circulation project, and the stated reason for it is the most interesting thing in the file.
What is actually changing
The applicant proposes two changes to how traffic moves through the site.
The first is at the eastern full-access driveway. Its egress would be modified to a right-turn-only exit. The staff report gives the purpose in the applicant’s own framing: to improve safety and reduce collisions by redirecting internal traffic to the western, signalized driveway onto Kirkville Road.
The second is inside the property. A new curb cut would create a right-only egress from the western side of the employee parking area, which sits between the building and the Kirkville Road frontage, connecting to the western internal access road. The purpose is to improve flow toward the western access road and the western full-access driveway.
Put together, both changes push traffic toward the signalized exit and away from the unsignalized one.
That is a sound piece of traffic engineering. Left turns out of a driveway across a county highway, with no signal, are among the highest-conflict movements in any site design. Converting one to right-turn-only removes that conflict entirely and sends those vehicles to a light instead.
The word in the filing is collisions
Site plan applications rarely say why. This one does.
The stated goal is to reduce collisions. That is the applicant telling the county, on the record, that the existing configuration has produced crashes.
CNY Signal has not obtained crash data for this driveway, and the county file does not include any. What the file establishes is that the operator considers the current eastern egress a safety problem significant enough to spend money fixing, and that the county planning board reviewed and endorsed the direction of that fix.
If you drive Kirkville Road near the Interstate 481 overpass, that is a useful thing to know about the driveway you pass.
The easement problem
The complication is underground and to the west.
Per a partial topographic and location survey dated June 2, 2026, the western access road sits inside a 90 foot wide Joint Access and Utility easement. A 20 foot wide water easement appears adjacent to it, running under a portion of the employee parking lot and the internal access roads.
County staff then state the issue plainly: it appears the proposed work on the western side of the site encroaches into both easements.
That is the same category of problem CNY Signal found in a Van Buren industrial application this month, and it carries the same consequence. An easement is a right held by someone else. What may be built inside a water easement in particular is tightly limited, because the utility needs to be able to dig.
The county attached the water authority’s standard requirement. The applicant must contact the Onondaga County Water Authority’s engineering department to determine what activities and structures are permitted within its easements and rights of way, along with water availability, hydrant flow test information, backflow prevention and fire flow.
That first item, what is permitted within the easement, is the operative one here.

The one modification
The board recommended a single modification, and it is the county highway department.
Onondaga County Department of Transportation requires the applicant to submit plans and coordinate Kirkville Road access with the department, with the town ensuring any mitigation the department determines is reflected on the project plans before approval.
Two standing advisories run alongside it. All existing or proposed driveways on Kirkville Road, which carries County Route 53, must meet department requirements. And no additional access to Kirkville Road will be permitted.
That second one bounds the whole project. Amazon is not getting a third driveway. It is rearranging the two it has.
Almost nothing gets disturbed
The environmental numbers on this one are unusually small, and they are worth stating because they distinguish a circulation project from a construction project.
Per the environmental assessment form dated May 19, 2026, 0.0409 acres of the site would be disturbed. That is roughly 1,780 square feet, on a 42 acre parcel. The form states no additional stormwater will be generated.
The plans also indicate no trees will be removed, which county staff note in the context of Indiana bat and Northern long-eared bat habitat, both listed as threatened or endangered. Where no trees come down, that risk largely does not arise.
Wetlands sit on the property but appear to be out of the way. GIS mapping shows the southern and eastern portions of the parking areas may contain state and federal wetlands, which appear to exclude the subject area. County staff note the wetland boundaries are not depicted in the plans.
What an overlay district actually did here
The 2019 step deserves more than a line, because it is the one that made everything after it possible.
An overlay district does not replace the zoning underneath it. It adds a second layer of rules that apply to a defined area, usually to permit a category of use the base zoning did not contemplate. DeWitt wrote a Transportation and Distribution Node Overlay District into its code and applied it to six parcels covering 70.45 acres.
The name is the giveaway. A transportation and distribution node is a freight facility. The district was created to allow that use in that place, and the following year the site plan for the facility arrived.
Towns face this choice regularly and there is no automatically right answer. A large distribution employer brings jobs and tax base. It also brings truck traffic onto roads that were not designed for it, which is how a town ends up reviewing a driveway modification six years later because the exits are producing crashes.
What is worth noticing is the order of operations. The zoning came first, the building came second, and the traffic consequences are being managed one application at a time ever since.
The floodplain under the parking lot
The flood finding is the one that outlives this application.
Current FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that the south and east portions of the site sit within the 100 year floodplain and the more restrictive floodway.
Per GIS mapping, the eastern driveway appears to encroach into the floodplain, though it is outside the floodway. And county staff add a broader observation: significant portions of the existing parking areas appear to encroach into the floodplain area.
That is not something this project creates or fixes. It is a description of a large distribution facility that already sits partly in a mapped flood zone. The county attached its standard hazard note, that the county Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies flooding as a natural hazard of local concern with the potential to cause extensive threat to property and safety.
How this site came to exist
The staff report lists the county’s prior reviews of this property, and read in order they explain a lot.
In 2015, referral Z-15-391 covered a 37 acre grading and filling project, including filling large wetlands, based on the property’s 1985 permit from the state Department of Environmental Conservation. A thirty year old permit authorizing wetland fill is an unusual foundation for a modern project.
In 2016, subdivision referral S-16-56 sought to combine six lots under common ownership. County staff note it does not appear the subdivision was completed.
In 2019, two concurrent local law referrals, Z-19-286 and Z-19-287, added a Transportation and Distribution Node Overlay District to the town zoning code and applied that new district to six parcels totaling 70.45 acres. Both were adopted.
That is the step everything else rests on. DeWitt wrote a new zoning district and applied it to this land, which is how a parcel becomes eligible for a facility of this kind.
In 2020, referrals Z-20-9 and S-20-10 covered construction of the Amazon facility itself. The county’s recommendations then included modifications and comments on access, traffic and stormwater impacts, wastewater accommodations, and impacts to wetlands and to critical drinking water infrastructure on site.
And in 2025, referral Z-25-122 covered a drive-thru Automated Vehicle Inspection outbuilding containing scanners and cameras.
Six years, seven referrals, a custom zoning district, and now a driveway modification to reduce collisions. That sequence is the anatomy of how a distribution center gets built and then keeps being adjusted afterward.
What happens next
The decision belongs to the Town of DeWitt Planning Board.
The questions worth following are narrow but real. Whether the county water authority permits the proposed work inside its easement, and what it requires if it does. Whether the county highway department wants anything more at the Kirkville Road driveways than what is drawn. And, separately from this application, whether the floodplain encroachment under the existing parking areas ever gets addressed.
The county’s August 5 minutes, including the resolution and the full staff report described here, are posted by the Onondaga County Department of Planning.
Sources
- Onondaga County Planning Board, Actions on GML Section 239 Referrals, August 5, 2026, case Z-26-182, including the resolution, the recommended modification and the full staff report: https://onondaga.gov/planning/wp-content/uploads/sites/260/2026/08/Draft-Minutes-08-05-26.pdf
- Environmental Assessment Form dated May 19, 2026, and Partial Topographic and Location Survey dated June 2, 2026, as cited in the staff report.
- Prior referrals Z-15-391, S-16-56, Z-19-286, Z-19-287, Z-20-9, S-20-10 and Z-25-122, as summarized in the past board reviews section of the staff report.
- New York General Municipal Law, Section 239-m.
Every figure in this story is drawn from the records above. Links go to the primary documents.